Work the world with jt65 and jt9 software#
Work the world with jt65 and jt9 trial#
Work the world with jt65 and jt9 series#

I had set up the software to control my radio via CAT control. While working stations, I occasionally ran into an issue where the radio would key up and transmit, but nothing was sent out. I also ran into a configuration issue when setting up my Signalink USB for JT65.

It does use USB like PSK31, but the modulation is different and the radio needs to be set properly. Some articles donвЂ™t seem to mention this so some beginners miss this point. It is anВ AFSK mode so you have to make sure you set your radio appropriately. ItвЂ™s a program that works with WSJT-X or JT65-HF alerting you to things like DXCC entities you need, states needed or WAS, stations you have worked before and many other things. Regardless of which one you choose, I would highly suggest adding JTAlert.

Work the world with jt65 and jt9 trial#

I would suggest downloading both and giving them a trial run before deciding. While there might be other software packages, JT65-HF an WSJT-X seem to the be the two most popular, based on my reading on the Net and forum posts on and qrz.com. The following are some learning experiences and things I would pass on to anyone interested in trying JT65 for the first time.

As of Dec 26, I only need 3 more states and I am determined to do it with JT65! I am slowly working on my basic WAS, trying to get most of the rest with JT65 or JT9. Since I started JT65 in the middle of December, I have made 108 JT65 QSOвЂ™s and 19 JT9 QSOвЂ™s. The entire QSO was over after both of us sent 73 messages! This is what almost all QSOвЂ™s are like. The Italian station called CQ and I answered at 1453 UTC time. The following is an actual QSO that I had with a station in Italy, using 10 watts and a homemade buddipole. Some stations that call CQ cut out of the messages making for a total of three sent for each station. The CQ station sends four messages while the station answering the CQ will send 3. One station ends up transmitting on the odd minutes, while the other station transmits on the even minutes. Again there is a 13.2 second decoding period and it all starts over again. The reply transmission is sent starting at the beginning of the next minute for the same 46.8 seconds.

Messages are transmitted on alternating minutes. JT9 uses much less bandwidth, and signals can be much closer together than JT65. I am finding that making JT9 contacts, works just like JT65, though the underlying protocols being sent over the air are different. WSJT-X will do both JT65 and JT9 but JT65-HF will only do JT65. Another popular program thatвЂ™s available is JT65-HF. While there are a few software packages available for JT65, I chose to use WSJT-X. The software will repeat the message over and over again until you tell it to stop. I suppose you could use it when a short message has to absolutely get through.

Work the world with jt65 and jt9 series#

I wondered for a while what practical use a series of 13 character messages would be, outside of making contacts simply for earning awards. The messages that are exchanged are very scripted and only 13 characters in length. JT65 is not a mode that anyone os going to rag chew on. Information is sent over and over again to provide redundancy Originally developed for EME (Earth-Moon-Earth, Moon bounce) application, itвЂ™s very common to use 5-10 watts making contacts all over the world, depending on the condition of the bands. Basically itвЂ™s a digital mode, thatвЂ™s great for low power operation. IвЂ™ll leave out all the history of the mode as itвЂ™s easy to find on the net. I was curious about JT65 a few weeks ago, so I downloaded some software and decided to give it a try. I liked PSK31 because I could watch a football game and work the quiet digital mode at the same time. I had been working a small amount of phone this year, along with a little PSK31.